The only real question is why green and not magenta like most people. You are using the printer/driver in a way that are not intended to be used. Transparancy targets work better than the reflective ones? My scans from my Nikon 8000 look great with the Faust targets. Desaturating should fix the problem but it still When IĬonvert it to adobe 98 it still looks green but the color numbers change from neutral to It looks green on the screen aswell (but reads neutral). Profile reads as neutral when I scan a Kodak Grey Scale. Scanner and I get the same weird green casts. Even the BillĪtkins profiles look bad (very green) on glossy and lustre papers.Īs far as I can tell the adobe 98 to custom profile should work well - the color files areĪnother weird thing is scanning images from my flatbed I use Wiziwyg to profile the Now when I print the same image as adobe98 to my custom profiles itĬomes out with a green/magenta mix which looks bad under all light sources. It actually looks really good under Sylvania Design 50įlourencent aswell.
The print comes out looking a bit green under my Philips 930 Flourescent bulbs but looks Then print using Relative Colormetric and In page setup I set document source to untagged and then set my printer space to theĬanned profile (electr16b) for my lacie monitor. I desaturate my images in photoshop to make sure they are neutral. I untagg the adobe98 document and work in an untagged working space. The work around I have found is a weird one: This color cast shows on every differnt paper profile/ Photoshop with my Wiziwyg profiles as the printer source. I find that my BW prints have a weird green cast when printed using Adobe98 in I use Optix XRįor my monitor profile and I have setup custom paper profiles using Wyziwyg for OS9. Run OSX 10.3 on a Mac G5 dual 1.8 and I have a Lacie electron 19 blue 1V. I have an Epson 9600 Ultrachrome printer using Photoblack ink and I Hi, I am new to photonet posting but I have read through the forums many times and find
0 kommentar(er)
